Sunday, 31 August 2014

Law and Virtues - Essential to the Ethical Practice of Law:

Gold Coast Lawyer - Ethics and the Law


Upholding high ethical standards is a key component of a lawyer's role, and to do this there are several virtues which are required. The virtues of diligence and honesty immediately come to mind. Virtues and law are interconnected at an intimate level, with the leading theorist on the topic being Thomas Aquinas.

Virtues in Law:

Virtues are integral to the practice of law, with one only having to look to the writings of Thomas Aquinas to see the connection between basic virtues and the imposing of laws. As he wrote; "Law is given for the purpose of directing human acts, and insofar as human acts conduce to virtue, to that extent does law make man good."

It must first be understood that there is a vast chasm between law and virtue. Law can be described as an extrinsic restraint of the actions of people, in particular those who are morally deficient, to limit their moral deficiencies. While virtue is the way in which one acts by their own free will in a moral way. The theories of Aquinas attempt to bridge this divide that exists between the law and morals. For him, "if the intention of the law giver is fixed on the true good... it follows that the effect is to make men good absolutely." Laws are designed to make men good, and the virtues that are inherent in the law can be classed as civic virtues, and a law-abiding citizen who follows these laws will therefore be a virtuous person. However not everyone is a law-abiding citizen and it is clear as day that there are unvirtuous people in the community, however these people will often obey the law through fear of punishment, and for Aquinas this is a kind of beginning of virtue. Meaning that law is a tool to create a virtuous society.

Aquinas wrote that; "the principles of the common law are said to be the seeds of the virtues." For him the law had the capacity to teach virtue to those willing to learn. At the same time it commands those who don't obey out of their inherent virtue, using different motivators to achieve the same result. However their motivation matters not as law is designed to not only restrain these people, but also to lead them to virtue. He does not pretend that every virtue is contained in the law, only those that are needed for the common good, and that it is impossible for the law to command every virtue and forbid every vice.

The Ethical Practice of Law:

Using these principles it's not a giant leap to assume that for the ethical practice of law, personal virtues play in incredibly important role. A virtue that deserves careful consideration is that of diligence. Diligence can be defined as, "reasonable care or attention to a matter." It seems obvious then that in the practice of law diligence would be an essential virtue for a lawyer to embody. It is the duty of a lawyer to act for their client with due diligence taking the appropriate legal action to protect their client’s interests and advance their position.

A second virtue that is essential to the ethical practice of law is that of honesty. A lawyer has a duty to act honestly in upholding the rule of law, and has a duty to the court to uphold this standard. As the Law Society of New South Wales' statement on the ethical responsibility of lawyers states; "We seek to maintain the highest standards of integrity honesty and fairness in all our dealings." Thomas Shaffer described this concept of trust as ‘parentalism’, in that a lawyer acted in a ‘parent-like’ way nurturing the needs of their client. A lawyer must understand the social setting of people and make decisions accordingly.

Conclusion:

Aquinas was correct when he described the principles of law as "the seeds of the virtues." The law is underpinned by basic moral principles that are even more important to be followed by those practicing the law than others. The virtues of diligence and honesty are two that are essential for the ethical practice of law.


To learn more about the services offered by Teddington Legal Gold Coast visit our website.

Wednesday, 27 August 2014

Updates from the Teddington Legal Gold Coast Blog - Part #2:



Hey everyone, we hope you've been enjoying our articles on legal theories. We thought we'd take this opportunity to share with you some recent posts from our main blog.


The New Frontier – Defining Metadata

The Federal Government’s metadata retention policy has been widely publicized and widely criticized, but at this stage the Government is pushing ahead with it. Much of the criticism leveled at the policy has been the lack of clarification of what...



Just Monkeying Around – Animals Selfies Can’t Be Copyrighted

Just a quick post for all those budding wildlife photographers out there – don’t let a curious monkey (or any other jungle animal for that matter) push the shutter button on your camera instead of you. Why you ask? The...



The Rights of Employees – Flexible Working Arrangements

As a business owner you have certain legal obligations to your employees and sometimes it can be difficult to navigate the needs of your business with the needs of your employees, however it is important that you are aware of...



More Good News if You’re Buying on the Gold Coast

We thought we’d share this article we found in the Gold Coast Bulletin recently about the property market on the Gold Coast. It’s good news if you’re looking to buy a house or apartment as the market continues to recover...



Recycling or Piggybacking? Emerging Technology and ‘Fair Use’

We’ve previously highlighted how Copyright law in Australia is in a sense ‘broken’ as it fails to keep pace with emerging technologies. What is considered as the biggest flaw in copyright law in this country is the lack of a...


To learn more about the services offered by Teddington Legal Gold Coast visit our website.

Friday, 22 August 2014

Updates from the Teddington Legal Gold Coast Blog:



Hey everyone, we hope you've been enjoying our articles on legal theories. We thought we'd take this opportunity to share with you some recent posts from our main blog.


Recent Posts:

Severing the Co-Ownership of Property – Tenants in Common:

Our previous post on co-ownership introduced the concept and the benefits and pitfalls of owning property with others. As you know there are a several ways in which co-ownership of a property can be extinguished, but this depends on the...


Severing the Co-Ownership of Property – Joint Tenants:

Co-ownership has many benefits, but also some pitfalls, in particular when it comes to the ending of a co-ownership arrangement. There are several ways in which co-ownership can cease, and it very much depends on the form in which the...


Protecting Your Interests – Personal Properties Securities Register:

The Personal Property Securities Act 2009 (“PPSA”) came into effect on 30 January 2012, bringing with it a raft of changes to the enforcement of securities over personal property, including a new unified Federal law. The transition period for the...


Conveyancing by Teddington Legal Gold Coast:

Conveyancing by Teddington Legal Gold Coast - Why choose us for your conveyancing? Experience – with years of property law experience, we will make sure that your legal risks are minimised and your rights are protected. Value for money –...


Is that Really on Sale? Misleading Pricing of Products:

We’ve all seen how common sale signs are becoming. It seems that every time you walk through a shopping centre there is a sale on at many of the stores, however a recent Federal Court decision has highlighted the danger...



To learn more about the services offered by Teddington Legal Gold Coast visit our website.

Peter Greste to Appeal Against Egypt Convictions:


As a person who is trained as both a journalist and a lawyer I can't help but feel for Peter Greste in his fight for freedom in Egypt. No-one should be locked up for simply doing their job. I hope that justice wins out in his appeal.

The following article was originally published on smh.com.au and authored by AFP.


Peter Greste to Appeal Against Egypt Convictions:


Jailed Australian journalist Peter Greste and two other al-Jazeera journalists jailed by Egypt for alleged ties with Islamists have filed appeals against their convictions, their network has said in a statement.

Greste, Egyptian-Canadian Mohamed Fadel Fahmy and Egyptian producer Baher Mohamed were convicted in June of aiding the blacklisted Muslim Brotherhood and spreading false news that portrayed Egypt as being in a state of "civil war".

Greste and Fahmy received seven-year terms, while Mohamed was jailed for 10 years, in a case that sparked international outrage.

Eleven defendants tried in absentia, including one Dutch and two British journalists, were given 10-year sentences.

"Lawyers for the jailed al-Jazeera journalists in Egypt have today filed appeals against their convictions," the network said on Thursday.

"The weaknesses in the case have been widely protested and ridiculed, and much of the public criticism is reflected in the grounds for appeal," it said.

Al-Jazeera said the case would be heard before the Court of Cassation, "which will examine the grounds for hearing a full appeal", but that the date has not yet been set.

It cited as grounds for appeal five key points, including "flaws in the arrest procedure" as well as "the fact that evidence presented in court did not marry with the charges".

"The appeal will lay bare the flaws in the case against Peter, Baher and Mohamed," said Al Anstey, the managing director of al-Jazeera English.

"We look forward to them being exonerated in due course. We will not stop in this quest till they are reunited with their families, and back doing the jobs they love."

Thursday, 7 August 2014

Things Lawyers Say:



The following are just a few snippets taken word for work from published court reports. They were put together in a book titled ‘Disorder in the Court: Great Fractured Moments in Courtroom History’ by Charles M. Sevilla.
_____________________________________


ATTORNEY: What was the first thing your husband said to you that morning?

WITNESS: He said, ‘Where am I, Cathy?’

ATTORNEY: And why did that upset you?

WITNESS: My name is Susan!

_____________________________________


ATTORNEY: What gear were you in at the moment of the impact?

WITNESS: Gucci sweats and Reeboks.
_____________________________________


ATTORNEY: Are you sexually active?

WITNESS: No, I just lie there.

_____________________________________


ATTORNEY: What is your date of birth?

WITNESS: July 18th.

ATTORNEY: What year?

WITNESS: Every year.

_____________________________________

ATTORNEY: How old is your son, the one living with you?

WITNESS: Thirty-eight or thirty-five, I can’t remember which.

ATTORNEY: How long has he lived with you?

WITNESS: Forty-five years.

_____________________________________

ATTORNEY: This myasthenia gravis, does it affect your memory at all?

WITNESS: Yes.

ATTORNEY: And in what ways does it affect your memory?

WITNESS: I forget..

ATTORNEY: You forget? Can you give us an example of something you forgot?
_____________________________________

ATTORNEY: Now doctor, isn’t it true that when a person dies in his sleep, he doesn’t know about it until the next morning?

WITNESS: Did you actually pass the bar exam?
_____________________________________


ATTORNEY: The youngest son, the 20-year-old, how old is he?

WITNESS: He’s 20, much like your IQ.
_____________________________________


ATTORNEY: Were you present when your picture was taken?

WITNESS: Are you shitting me?

_____________________________________


ATTORNEY: So the date of conception (of the baby) was August 8th?

WITNESS: Yes.

ATTORNEY: And what were you doing at that time?

WITNESS: Getting laid

_____________________________________

ATTORNEY: She had three children , right?

WITNESS: Yes.

ATTORNEY: How many were boys?

WITNESS: None.

ATTORNEY: Were there any girls?

WITNESS: Your Honor, I think I need a different attorney. Can I get a new attorney?
_____________________________________

ATTORNEY: How was your first marriage terminated?

WITNESS: By death.
ATTORNEY: And by whose death was it terminated?

WITNESS: Take a guess.
_____________________________________


ATTORNEY: Can you describe the individual?

WITNESS: He was about medium height and had a beard

ATTORNEY: Was this a male or a female?

WITNESS: Unless the Circus was in town I’m going with male.

_____________________________________

ATTORNEY: Is your appearance here this morning pursuant to a deposition notice which I sent to your attorney?

WITNESS: No, this is how I dress when I go to work.

ATTORNEY: Doctor , how many of your autopsies have you performed on dead people?

WITNESS: All of them. The live ones put up too much of a fight.
_____________________________________

ATTORNEY: ALL your responses MUST be oral, OK? What school did you go to?

WITNESS: Oral…

_____________________________________

ATTORNEY: Do you recall the time that you examined the body?

WITNESS: The autopsy started around 8:30 PM

ATTORNEY: And Mr. Denton was dead at the time?

WITNESS: If not, he was by the time I finished.

_____________________________________

ATTORNEY: Are you qualified to give a urine sample?

WITNESS: Are you qualified to ask that question?

_____________________________________

ATTORNEY: Doctor, before you performed the autopsy, did you check for a pulse?

WITNESS: No.

ATTORNEY: Did you check for blood pressure?

WITNESS: No.

ATTORNEY: Did you check for breathing?

WITNESS: No..

ATTORNEY: So, then it is possible that the patient was alive when you began the autopsy?

WITNESS: No.

ATTORNEY: How can you be so sure, Doctor?

WITNESS: Because his brain was sitting on my desk in a jar.
ATTORNEY: I see, but could the patient have still been alive, nevertheless?

WITNESS: Yes, it is possible that he could have been alive and practicing law.


For more information about Teddington Legal Gold Coast visit our website.

Sunday, 3 August 2014

Sample Letter of Advice:





Alex Marshall
14 Fox Street
Tugan QLD 4224



Dear Ms Marshall,

RE: Fence Issue

We refer to the above matter and your interview with the writer on January 31, 2013.

We confirm your instructions to provide advice to you on your options in having the dividing fence replaced between your property located at 14 Fox Street, Tugan and that of Julie and Michal Robinson, located at 12 Fox Street Tugan.

You advised us that you were aware the adjoining fence between your properties was in need of repair when you purchased the property and you subsequently got a quote for the repair of around $3,600. You dropped a note to the Julie and Michael Robinson advising them of this.

In December 2012 you had the fence looked at again and discovered it now requires replacing due to further damage that has occurred to it. A note was again dropped to your neighbours about this.

However no agreement has been reached between you and Julie and Michael Robinson.

Our advice to you is based on these instructions.

Advice:

Negotiation:
  • You can enter into a negotiation with Julie and Michael Robinson about replacing the fence. A negotiation is where you all sit down and discuss the matter and attempt to reach an agreement. As you described getting a response from them has been difficult, so we are happy to write a letter to them inviting them to a negotiation if you wish. 

Mediation:
  • You can invite Julie and Michael Robinson to enter into mediation whereby a mediator will hear from both sides and assist both parties to reach an agreement in replacing the fence. We are again happy to write a letter to Julie and Michael Robinson inviting them to this mediation if you wish. 
  • Mediation will usually take place over the telephone and generally takes between one and three hours. 

Rights Under Legislation:
  • Under the Neighbourhood Disputes Resolution Act 2011 if there is no sufficient fence in place, as you have described, then the cost of replacing the fence is to be distributed equally between the landowners, being yourself and Julie and Michael Robinson. 
  • However unless the work is urgent you cannot force Julie and Michael Robinson to contribute to the costs unless it is ordered by the Queensland Civil and Administrative Tribunal (QCAT). QCAT is a tribunal that will hear and make a decision to resolve a dispute. You can make an application to QCAT by visiting their website (http://www.qcat.qld.gov.au). 
  • Before making an application though you must supply Julie and Michael Robinson with a notice to fence, which is a letter outlining an estimate of the cost, their required contribution to the cost and the method of construction. You should supply two quotes with the letter. If after one month an agreement has not been reach between you then an application can be made to QCAT. 

Our recommendation to you is to proceed to mediation and allow a mediator to help both parties reach an agreement in replacing the fence.

If you have any questions or would like us to assist you in anyway please don’t hesitate to call our office.

Your sincerely,

For more information about Teddington Legal Gold Coast visit our website.

Friday, 1 August 2014

Teddington Legal Gold Coast - Blog Update




Hey everyone, we hope you've been enjoying our articles on legal theories. We thought we'd take this opportunity to share with you some recent posts from our main blog.


Recent Posts:


A New Trend or a Worthwhile Investment? The Social Media Pre-Nup:

It’s every ex-partner’s nightmare. You split with your boyfriend or girlfriend and before you know it they’re posting less than flattering, or even worse, risqué pictures and comments about you all over social media. And while you may have been...


Did You Actually Shop Here? Fake Business Reviews:

Advertising your small business online is definitely the way to go these days, with potential to reach a large audience with a much smaller outlay than traditional media. With this in mind we thought we’d highlight a recent move by...


Social Media and the Law:

Social media is one of the most valuable tools that a small business can use as part of its marketing strategy, which makes it increasingly important to know how the law applies to it to avoid getting into any trouble....


Swimwear Design and the Need to Protect Copyright:

A recent decision by the Federal Court of Australia has highlighted the importance of protecting your intellectual property and it could be particularly important for those budding fashion and swimwear designers out there to pay attention to. The case was...


Time is of the Essence in Conveyancing:

A legal principle that is crucial in the conveyancing process is that of ‘time is of the essence’, which essentially means that on any date upon which a deadline falls, each party to the conveyance has until 5pm to fulfill...



For more information about Teddington Legal Gold Coast visit our website.